The problem

Reporting a number is not improving it

25%

of Medicare patients experienced harm during a hospital stay. 43% of those events were preventable

Industry figure, not an Adelo Consulting result. Source: HHS Office of Inspector General, report OEI-06-18-00400.

Most organizations know their CLABSI, CAUTI, falls and pressure injury rates to two decimal places. Far fewer can describe the specific process failure behind the last five events, or name the person accountable for the fix.

We work at the level where harm is actually prevented: the bedside process, the escalation pathway, the handoff, and the leadership rhythm that surfaces a deteriorating patient before the rapid response call.

Fewer harm events, and a system that explains why.

What we do

Capabilities in clinical quality & safety.

Harm reduction programs

CLABSI, CAUTI, falls with injury, pressure injury, VTE, medication safety and surgical site infection — root cause through sustained process change.

Failure to rescue and deterioration

Early warning systems, escalation pathways, rapid response design and chain-of-command that functions under pressure.

High reliability and safety culture

Safety event reporting, just culture implementation, daily safety huddles, and leadership rounding that produces action.

Mortality and outcomes review

Observed-to-expected mortality analysis, documentation and coding accuracy, and clinical review of outlier populations.

Sepsis and time-sensitive conditions

Sepsis bundle compliance, stroke and STEMI pathways, and the operational reality behind time-based measures.

Quality infrastructure

Committee structure, measure inventory, data governance and the reporting architecture that makes quality legible to a board.

What we target

Outcomes we scope engagements against.

These are the results we design toward and measure. We commit to targets in writing at the start of an engagement, and we report against them honestly — including when we miss.

We do not publish client results we cannot substantiate or attribute. Targets on this page describe engagement design, not guaranteed outcomes.

  • Harm event rates reduced with an identified mechanism, not a coincidence
  • Escalation pathways that function on nights and weekends
  • Documentation that reflects the acuity actually treated
  • Board-level quality reporting leadership can defend
  • Accountability that reaches the unit, not just the committee
Engagement models

Three ways to start.

1

Diagnostic2–4 weeks

A focused assessment with a written finding and a ranked set of actions. Fixed fee, defined scope. Most relationships start here because it is a low-risk way to find out whether we are useful.

2

Sprint8–16 weeks

A defined improvement engagement against a named target — throughput, denials, turnover, survey readiness. We work alongside your team rather than around them, and we transfer the method as we go.

3

Embedded6–18 months

Interim leadership or sustained transformation support. Our leader carries real accountability in your operating structure, with a written mandate and measurable commitments.

Frequently engaged by