The problem

Readiness is a condition, not a project

77%

of hospital condition-level deficiencies fall into just six Conditions of Participation — patient rights, nursing services, quality improvement, medical records, governing body and emergency services

Industry figure, not an Adelo Consulting result. Source: Analysis of 34,522 CMS hospital deficiencies, 2007–2017, published in the Journal of Patient Safety.

The pattern is familiar: a mock survey six weeks out, a binder, a flurry of education, and a passing result that decays within a quarter. It works until it does not — and when it does not, the finding arrives with a condition-level tag attached.

We build compliance into daily operations, and when the finding has already landed, we write and execute the plan of correction that actually clears.

Survey-ready as an operating state, not an event.

What we do

Capabilities in regulatory & compliance.

Survey readiness and mock survey

Joint Commission, DNV, CIHQ and state survey preparation, with tracer methodology run the way surveyors run it.

Plan of correction and immediate jeopardy

Rapid response to condition-level findings and IJ, including on-site leadership through removal and validation.

CMS Conditions of Participation

Gap assessment and remediation across CoP, with particular depth in nursing service, QAPI, patient rights and infection control.

Life safety and environment of care

EOC and life safety readiness, rounding programs, and documentation that survives a records review.

Compliance program effectiveness

Program structure, auditing and monitoring, reporting channels and the seven elements in practice rather than on paper.

Licensure, certification and accreditation strategy

New program licensure, accreditation body selection and disease-specific certification.

What we target

Outcomes we scope engagements against.

These are the results we design toward and measure. We commit to targets in writing at the start of an engagement, and we report against them honestly — including when we miss.

We do not publish client results we cannot substantiate or attribute. Targets on this page describe engagement design, not guaranteed outcomes.

  • Findings closed and validated, not deferred
  • Readiness maintained between survey windows
  • Documentation that reflects the care actually delivered
  • Leadership able to answer a surveyor without a binder
  • A compliance program a board can attest to
Engagement models

Three ways to start.

1

Diagnostic2–4 weeks

A focused assessment with a written finding and a ranked set of actions. Fixed fee, defined scope. Most relationships start here because it is a low-risk way to find out whether we are useful.

2

Sprint8–16 weeks

A defined improvement engagement against a named target — throughput, denials, turnover, survey readiness. We work alongside your team rather than around them, and we transfer the method as we go.

3

Embedded6–18 months

Interim leadership or sustained transformation support. Our leader carries real accountability in your operating structure, with a written mandate and measurable commitments.

Frequently engaged by